REPORT OF THE STATUTORY AUDITOR to the General Meeting of Bellevue Group AG Küsnacht
Report on the audit of the financial statements
We have audited the financial statements of Bellevue Group AG, which comprise the profit and loss account for the year ended 31 December 2020, the balance sheet as at 31 December 2020 and notes for the year then ended, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the financial statements as at 31 December 2020 comply with Swiss law and the company’s articles of incorporation.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under those provisions and standards are further described in the «Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements» section of our report.
We are independent of the entity in accordance with the provisions of Swiss law and the requirements of the Swiss audit profession and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Our audit approach
Overall materiality: CHF 1'100'000
We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the entity, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the entity operates.
As key audit matter the following area of focus has been identified:
Impairment of participations
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Our audit opinion aims to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
How we determined it
0.78% of the equity of the company
Rationale for the materiality benchmark applied
We chose equity as the benchmark because the company considered for itself is conducting limited operational activities and, in our view, the equity is a generally accepted benchmark for holding companies.
We designed our audit by determining materiality and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we considered where subjective judgements were made; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
Report on key audit matters based on the circular 1/2015 of the Federal Audit Oversight Authority
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Impairment of participations
Key audit matter
The shares of the capital of subsidiaries held by the Company are recognized in the financial statements under ’Participations’ (TCHF 112’580).
Participations are recognized at acquisition cost less any economically necessary impairments.
Bellevue Group AG uses the discounted cash flow method for selected subsidiaries in order to test whether any impairments are necessary. For other subsidiaries, the net-asset value method respectively the net realizable-value method is used for the impairment assessment. The valuation is calculated based on the expected future cash flows to the investor respectively by comparing the book value of the participation to the equity of the respective subsidiary.
We consider the assessment of the impairment of participations as a key audit matter because the Board of Directors has to apply judgement in setting the assumptions relating to future business results and the discount rate to be applied on the forecasted cash flows; significant estimation uncertainty exists and moreover, participations represent a significant amount on the balance sheet (80% of total assets).
We refer to note 1 (Accounting principles) and note 2 (Notes to the financial statements).
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
We have analysed and assessed the assumptions applied by the Board of Directors to the valuation of the participations in the financial statements of Bellevue Group AG.
Management adheres to a documented process in forecasting cash flows. For participations with increased risks, the Board of Directors monitors this process and regularly challenges the assumptions that are used. We assessed the appropriateness and proper application of the valuation method used to determine the value of the participations.
We compared the business results of the year under review with the year’s budgeted results, in order to retrospectively assess the accuracy of assumptions used in the forecasting of the cash flows.
We compared Management’s assumptions concerning revenue growth and long-term growth rates with economic and industry-specific developments.
We compared the discount rate with the cost of capital of the company and of comparable enterprises, taking into account country-specific particularities.
In respect of the analysis of the net asset value, we compared the book value of the participations recorded in the balance sheet with the proportionate equity of the subsidiaries.
Further, we assessed whether the subsidiaries had prepared their financial statements based on the assumption of continuing as going concern and whether this was appropriate.
We assess the process of the examination of recoverability and determination of value adjustments of participations as appropriate.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors for the financial statements
The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the provisions of Swiss law and the company’s articles of incorporation, and for such internal control as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the website of EXPERTsuisse: http://expertsuisse.ch/en/audit-report-for-public-companies. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
In accordance with article 728a paragraph 1 item 3 CO and Swiss Auditing Standard 890, we confirm that an internal control system exists which has been designed for the preparation of financial statements according to the instructions of the Board of Directors.
We further confirm that the proposed appropriation of available earnings complies with Swiss law and the company’s articles of incorporation. We recommend that the financial statements submitted to you be approved.
Auditor in charge
Zurich, 1 March 2021
PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, Birchstrasse 160, Postfach, CH-8050 Zürich, Switzerland
Telefon: +41 58 792 44 00, Telefax: +41 58 792 44 10, www.pwc.ch
PricewaterhouseCoopers AG is a member of the global PricewaterhouseCoopers network of firms, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.